14 May 2018

Your Weekly Market Focus
 
Few candidates for EM pain

Author: Richard Jerram, Chief Economist, Bank of Singapore Member of OCBC Wealth Panel

The 2013 taper tantrum showed that when U.S. monetary policy is expected to tighten, financial markets tend to focus on the consequences for poorly-managed economies with significant external deficits.

Higher US rates causing some concern
As we saw five years ago, the prospect of higher U.S. interest rates can lead to fears of difficulty in funding deficits. Financial markets seem to be waking up to the idea that the Fed is behind the curve and will need to implement a sequence of rate hikes over the coming 18 months.

The good news is that not many emerging markets look vulnerable. The bad news is that the source of current stress is not going away.

We can add persistent geo-political tensions into the mix, which could also be driving risk aversion.

Generally there is not a big problem with a fast growing economy running a moderate current account deficit – with 3 per cent of GDP usually seen as a threshold. Returns on investment should be higher, so borrowing money to fund growth is a reasonable strategy.

Small countries are unlikely to contribute to any systemic problem, so we only consider economies larger than US$200b, of which there are 32 in the emerging markets space.

Not many emerging markets look vulnerable
We find half of these countries are running a deficit, but it is over 3 per cent of GDP in only five cases (Turkey, Argentina, Pakistan, Egypt and Romania – which ironically gives us the acronym
TAPER).

These five have a combined GDP equivalent to 2.7 per cent of global output, which looks too small to be systemically threatening.

In addition to Turkey, some other taper tantrum victims from 2013 still look slightly vulnerable, such as South Africa (2.9 per cent of GDP deficit in 2018), India (2.3 per cent) and Indonesia (1.9 per cent).

In addition there could be concerns over countries that are facing elections (Brazil, Mexico), as this introduces uncertainty into the policy outlook. However, only Turkey and South Africa still look vulnerable if we focus on current account positions.
14may2018-Few-candidates-or-EM-pain-1

Asia stands out for the progress since the financial crisis two decades ago. Ahead of the 1997-98 crisis, many countries were running huge deficits, in addition to the problem of having over-valued exchange rates and too few reserves for levels of short-term debt. The situation is far more stable today, with abundant reserves, floating exchange rates and current account surpluses.

14may2018-Few-candidates-or-EM-pain
This gives us confidence that the stress related to higher U.S. interest rates will be limited to those few countries that need to finance significant deficits. There is also the hope that, as with the taper tantrum, this could also contribute to better policy discipline, which brings benefits over the medium term.

Interest rates are low across most emerging markets (again, Argentina and Turkey are exceptions) so there should be room to raise rates, if necessary, to support the exchange rate, without causing much economic damage. Indonesia is a good example, and it looks as if they will bring forward a rate hike to this week’s policy meeting.

The situation could become more problematic if U.S. interest rates rise quickly and the USD continues to rally. However, we think the growing U.S. twin deficits will prevent sustained USD strength. There is also the risk of self-fulfilling expectations, as capital outflows drive EM currency weakness and trigger more outflows.

However, the limited nature of overall EM vulnerability makes this unlikely.

Asia much more resilient than in the past
As a result, we believe it is more likely that EM currencies are in a late stage of sell-off, with the exception of high current account deficit countries such as TRY and ARS. EM FX has recently traded worse than what would be consistent with fundamentals. We believe it is wrong to extrapolate the problems of Argentina and Turkey to other EMs. In short, the market seemed to have exaggerated the risks for EM. This would create buying opportunities once the USD stabilises and worries over higher U.S. yields and global growth subside.

 
OCBC MoneyMonday™